AI Integration in MCQ Development: Assessing Quality in Medical Education: A Systematic Review

Fizzah Ali, Hajra Talat

SUMMARY

This systematic review focuses on examining how artificial intelligence is included in multiple-choice questions and how this affects the efficacy and quality of assessments used in education. Several papers investigating the application of artificial intelligence in multiple-choice question creation have been found through a thorough literature analysis. The present study employed a systematic literature review to comprehensively analyze the existing literature and underscore the effects of incorporating artificial intelligence into creating multiple-choice questions on the standard and efficacy of assessments used in education. Between January 2019 and January 2024, we examined papers from credible publications, concentrating on sixteen chosen articles for in-depth examination. The results show how artificial intelligence can revolutionize traditional evaluation methods in education by improving the accuracy, efficiency, and diversity of multiple-choice questions. While artificial intelligence models like ChatGPT, Bard, and Bing have shown encouraging results in creating multiple-choice questions, issues with validity, complexity, and reasoning ability still need to be addressed. Notwithstanding its drawbacks, artificial intelligence-driven multiple-choice question holds great potential for enhancing evaluation processes and enhancing educational opportunities in a variety of subject areas. This Systematic review highlights the necessity of further research and advancement to fully utilize artificial intelligence in creating multiple-choice questions and its incorporation into frameworks for educational assessments.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Educational Measurement, Education, Medical Education, Questionnaires.

How to cite this: Ali F, Talat H. AI Integration in MCQ Development: Assessing Quality in Medical Education: A Systematic Review. Life and Science. 2024; 5(3): 413-426. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.643

Read PDF